Below is a GREAT article written
by Amanda Morgan on the value of play and its role in academics. It's a little
long but it’s well worth the read.Although the article specifically refers to preschool, I think all grades should consider the role of play in academics.
Play vs Academics: A False Dichotomy
An argument is brewing in the preschool
scene. In one corner, you have those arguing for more academics
to give children that head start that might correct the troubles of high-school
drop-outs and low test scores. They claim that children rise to the occasion
and show that they are capable of more than we’ve been asking.
In the other corner, you’ll find those who say play is disappearing from the
cultural landscape of America
and that its absence is a contributor to many childhood maladies such as
obesity, ADHD, and declining social skills. They say that children “rising to
the occasion” are really only performing splinter
skills, which are more closely aligned with party tricks than with
actual learning.
Certainly, both camps can make compelling arguments. But each time I read an
article giving voice to the two sides, I find myself thinking: these aren’t mutually exclusive points of view. The notion that a child’s education can either be
playful or academic seems to be creating an unfortunate and false dichotomy.
It seems to me that setting play and academics
at odds with each other is pitting the method against the goal. It’s not an
either/or choice, it’s a means and an end.
The term “academic” has come to mean “formal, direct instruction”, and in that
sense, the two modes are different. But when “academic” is viewed as scholarly
and giving rise to study and learning, it easily goes hand in hand with a
play-based education structure.
To be sure, often the two camps are really at odds over what expectations are
developmentally appropriate. But if we’re talking about developmentally appropriate learning outcomes, truly, academics
can be taught and learned through a play-based curriculum. In fact, in many
ways, I believe that the format of play and experience can teach and prepare
young children for concepts that are more advanced than could be taught in a
formal, conventional way. Here’s an example.
You would (hopefully) never consider plopping a multiplication
worksheet down in front of a preschooler, followed by an explanation of the
basic principles and procedures of algebra. However, I know a phenomenal
preschool teacher who recently gave her students a similar challenge, but in an
authentic, playful way.
As this teacher sat down to snack with a group of her students, she noted that
there were five people at the table and each person could have 3 crackers. She
then asked the children at the table how many crackers she should put on the
plate to serve. One child enthusiastically answered, “Three!” So the
teacher placed three crackers on the plate and set it on the table. The
children looked around at five hungry faces, trying to figure out where they
went wrong. As the gears turned in their minds, one child suddenly shouted, “Fifteen!
We need fifteen!” Not bad for a “non-academic” school.
A quality play-based learning environment is
not just a glorified birthday party.
Each activity, each nook and cranny, and every loose part is arranged and made
available with specific developmental objectives in mind. Ask a teacher and he
or she will be able to tell you, “That builds fine motor skills for
writing. That promotes sorting, which is the basis of the set theory of
mathematics. This will help with phonological
awareness, which leads to literacy. Here we invite creativity and
problem-solving while over there they are using their language and
interpersonal skills.”
It’s those foundational experiences that allow children to learn advanced
concepts more easily and more thoroughly. I worry that in our effort to get
ahead in education, we’re simply skipping these foundational pieces so often
learned through play. It’s like being in a rush to construct a tall building,
so we decide to forget about the foundation (nobody really sees that anyway)
and jump right to the first floor. It might look OK at first, but eventually we
get to the second or third floor and suddenly we realize that things aren’t
solid, and we find ourselves slipping. I really think many of the academic
problems we see in primary grades are not because the children didn’t start
formal instruction early enough, but because they don’t have enough
foundational experience for that formal instruction to make any lasting
connections.
I guess what bothers me most is that setting play and academics at odds with
each other often implies that one is for feel-good fun and the other is for
real learning. That one is just daycare and the other is school. In reality, a
play-based education is not only more responsive and developmentally
appropriate for young children, but it also teaches them not only how to
answer, but how to think. Not just to recite, but to inquire. Not simply to
complete worksheets, but to build connections. Academic content isn’t just
taught, it’s meaningfully constructed.
With something to think about this is Mrs. Morris reminding you to ...